Bill extends GET support on Oahu, raises TAT one
percent, provides needed accountability
In order to provide the City and County of
Honolulu with the funding to complete its $8.2 billion rail project House and
Senate Committee Chairs have drafted a bill to be considered during a special
legislative session next week.
The proposed bill will:
·
Extend the general excise tax surcharge on Oahu for three additional
years, from December 31, 2027 through December 31, 2030. This will provide
$1.046 billion.
·
Raise the hotel room tax charged to visitors (Transient
Accommodation Tax) by one percent from 9.25 percent to 10.25 percent for 13 years,
from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2030. This also applies to timeshares.
This will provide $1.326 billion.
·
The current method of collecting the hotel room tax remains
the same. It is collected statewide and goes directly into the general fund,
not to the island where it is collected. Each county receives a specified
amount of the tax regardless of total amounts collected. Raising the tax does
not change that amount.
·
Permanently increase the counties’ share of the TAT from its
current $93 million base to $103 million.
·
Reduce the State Department of Taxation’s administrative fee
on the GET surcharge from 10 percent to one percent.
·
Require a state run audit of the rail project and annual
financial reviews.
The bill also
provides that funds collected for rail go into a new Mass Transit Special Fund
and rather than simply give the money to the City, the State Comptroller will review
and disburse the funds to the City for its costs as the project moves forward.
This will allow the state to keep track of both spending and construction
progress.
Currently, the GET
surcharge is automatically transferred to the city on a quarterly basis without
any oversight. This bill will change that practice to ensure accountability and
transparency by having the Comptroller review and approve the expenses before the
City and HART are reimbursed. It also establishes better internal control and
ensures that waste and fraud does not occur.
This bill addresses
the immediate rail construction shortfall by collecting funds upfront through a
modest TAT increase instead of adding additional years of GET surcharge on the
back end. This will likely reduce the financing costs of the project by
hundreds of millions of dollars.
A rail bill that
relies solely on GET will continue to tax the poor and increase the cost to
taxpayers in the long term. By including the TAT, visitors will now bear a
significant portion of the financing burden.
Having these two
funding sources for the City and County’s rail project also provides greater
security for the project in case either the GET or TAT does not perform as
expected.
House Speaker Scott
K. Saiki (Kakaako, Downtown) said the $2.378
billion funding shortfall package will fund the rail project through Ala
Moana and will not jeopardize the $1.55 billion in federal funding.
“By working with our
colleagues in the Senate, the Legislature has come up with a concrete plan to
fund the rail project that will reduce the overall costs while shifting some of
the regressive tax burden away from our residents, who are struggling to make
ends meet,” Saiki said. “This plan will not have a direct impact on neighbor
island county budgets.
“We have taken a
long look at the rail project and have heard the concerns of residents during
our joint public hearing on rail funding this month. This is a critical
infrastructure project for Hawaii. We are not giving the City a blank check but
instead insisting on audits and financial reviews and expenditures to provide
complete transparency for our taxpayers.”
Senate President Ron
Kouchi (D, Kauai-Niihau) said, "I want to thank my colleagues and their
respective staffs for all of their efforts in developing this proposed compromise
draft bill that includes a permanent increase in the counties' share of the TAT
from its current $93 million base to $103 million. I am hopeful that this compromise legislation
will satisfy the FTA's construction cost concerns as testified to numerous
times by the City and County of Honolulu.
No comments:
Post a Comment